Thursday, February 02, 2006

'Unmanageable Payment Shock' Seen: Bies

A Fed official had this to say about home loans this morning. "Regulators are concerned about heavy commercial real estate exposures and risky mortgage lending practices at U.S. banks, Federal Reserve Board Governor Susan Bies said on Thursday. 'There are certain rapidly growing business lines in banking operations that are placing pressures on risk-management systems,' Bies (said) as she outlined guidance regulators have issued on commercial real estate and so-called nontraditional mortgage lending." "In discussing the guidance on exotic mortgage products, such as interest-only loans, Bies repeated that government regulators were concerned risk-management practices had not kept pace with the risks that these widely available loan products could present. She also cautioned those risks could be 'heightened by a downturn in the housing market.'" "Bies said that in the past such products were normally offered to higher-income borrowers only, but they now were being extended to low-income borrowers in the subprime market. 'These borrowers are more likely to experience an unmanageable payment shock at some point during the life of the loan, which means they may be more likely to default on the loan,' she warned." "Bies also expressed worry that banks could face difficulties if abnormally low risk-spreads in capital markets increased. 'When risk spreads return to more 'normal' levels, banks need to be prepared for the resulting impact on liquidity and pricing,' she said." "Bies added that regulators had observed that lenders were increasingly combining nontraditional mortgage loans with weaker controls on credit exposure. 'The absence of traditional underwriting controls may have unforeseen effects on losses realized in these products,' she said." And Inman News has this related report. "Foreclosure activity in California edged up in fourth-quarter 2005, according to DataQuick. Lending institutions sent 14,999 default notices to California homeowners from October to December, up 19 percent from 12,606 for the third quarter, and up 15.6 percent from 12,978 for fourth-quarter 2004." "'Because of the rise in home values, much of that financial distress has been covered by the increasing amount of equity that people have had in their homes. That equity is now being created at a slower pace, and default activity is inevitably on the rise,' said Marshall Prentice." "The median amount owed when the default notice was recorded was $6,862 in fourth-quarter 2005, up from $6,130 for the same period a year ago. All regions of the state saw an increase in foreclosure activity, ranging from 10.5 percent in the Bay Area to 19.6 percent in Southern California. In Southern California, the number of notices jumped from 1,123 to 1,607 (43.1 percent) in Riverside County; from 872 to 1,173 (34.5 percent) in San Diego; from 684 to 918 (34.2 percent) in Orange County." "In Northern California, the number of notices increases from 636 to 849 (31.4 percent) in Sacramento County and from 73 to 106 (45.2 percent) in San Francisco. On a loan-by-loan basis, mortgages are least likely to go into default in Marin County. The likelihood is highest in the Central Valley and Inland Empire." "'While foreclosure properties tugged property values down by almost 10 percent in some areas nine years ago, the effect on today's market is negligible,' DataQuick reported."

13 comments:

  1. ocwatcher,

    IMO this is just getting started. With each month of even flat prices, and more borrowers having their loans recast, the pressure should pressure the retail market.

    Alsorenting,

    On my foreclosure blog, I recently posted on how just a few foreclosures is bringing down prices in entire neighborhoods from North Carolina to Ohio.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The time to act was 3 years ago not now. Nuff' Said

    David
    Bubble Meter Blog

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who owns these MBSecs? We all do even those of us who are trying our very best to be as far away from this mess as possible. In the 20s it was buying stocks on margin. Today, real estate on margin. It won't be that bad, we have better circuit breakers, bigger printing presses, more sophisticated models. Unfortunately that means we are much much faster responding.The -speed- of the correction is going to astound everyone who is relying on historical examples. There's $17trillion in residential housing. In three years; $11t. More than $64,000 per second that is evaporating. Here, let me make it easy. "It's a Wonderful Life" when Jimmy Stewart trying to stem a run on the building and loan says; "don't you understand the money isn't here, it's in his house and his house and her house..."

    So, what's gonna happen? Easy, the banks will pay whatever interest rates they have to to depositors and the Fed wil let them. M3 won't show this scheme as M3 stops being reported next month. Same thing with the burgeoning SocSEc and Medicare price tags. Tightrope Ben will have printing ink on his fingers up to his elbows. Ahhh, to have a 30yr fixed 4.95% 20% LTV. I think I'll just check on eBay for a $150,000 RV on sale for $30,000. Why? because I've got kids 3,6 and 10 yrs out of college. If the "full boat" sports (deserved) and the "full boat" merit scholarships (deserved) don't appear they'll live in the driveway of some FB in San Luis Obispo and/or Cambridge.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Guidance"

    Excellent. As guidance I suggest you send me $1000 for my continued approval. If you ignore my guidance I will get angry. I may even yell and call you names but not so loud that you get hurt. Huff, huff, I'm getting angry, you better watch out. Follow my guidance or... or... I'll... I'll get angrier! Grrrr.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Inventory is up 25% in a single month for my South Florida Zip Code...(33134)

    157 properties as of Jan. 6, 2006.
    180 properties as of Jan. 21, 2006.
    194 properties as of Feb. 2, 2006.

    ReplyDelete
  6. On Dec 20 the Fed published for 60 day comment a new rule:

    “Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Products”
    “Collateral-Dependent Loans – Institutions should avoid the use of loan terms and underwriting practices that may result in the borrower having to rely on the sale or refinancing of the property once amortization begins.


    The key word here is should.

    This word implies conditionality, not obligation. Therefore IMO this proposed "rule" has no teeth and is really just a suggestion, not a requirement.

    In any event, loan brokers desperate to keep their wobbly businesses alive can and will doctor borrowers incomes and use crooked appraisers to circumvent this "rule."

    ReplyDelete
  7. stockmonkey said:

    "Anecdotally speaking, homes in my area of Salt Lake are selling quickly (often first day on market with multiple offers) and for very high prices."

    *********

    I'm guessing CA "equity nomad" and/or speculators?

    I think I read somewhere recently (perhaps here) that SLC and CA markets are countercyclical to each other, or have been, with regard to real estate.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I have said it before and I will say it again...we have not yet had a catalyst that will cause LOTS of foreclosures!!!

    People keep looking at the 'low' foreclosure rates...and lending away.

    Just wait!!! Give it another 6-24 months, then tell me about the foreclosure picture!

    Foreclosures (and the media for that matter) are LAGGING indicators.

    Stay tuned for up to date info...

    SoCalMtgGuy

    Another F@CKED Borrower

    ReplyDelete
  9. gestucco, first quoting another, said:

    "'PS I have been waiting for the "crash" for over a year now. When is it coming?'

    1:25 PM

    It is already underway. You do not see it because you are looking around for an automobile crash. A housing market crash is more like a slow-moving California mudslide that gradually obliterate anything in its path."

    *********

    All true. Except for the "slow-moving" part.

    For like avalanches, California mudslides (and perhaps housing crashes) often gain speed as they go along.

    So at some point - they can really be moving.

    "Look out below!"

    I'm reminded of David Letterman throwing watermelons off the "tower in New Rochelle" in the mid-80's.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Forbes had a little more detail on the California defaults.

    'In Los Angeles, default notices are up 10.7%; in San Francisco, they are up 45.2%; in Napa, they are up a whopping 175%.'

    ReplyDelete
  11. also renting in ma suggests that the problem of ARMs and I/Os resetting is not significant.

    Anyone seen any published analysis trying to quantify this?

    I have seen numbers like $300B resetting in 2006 and $2Trillion resetting in 2007. Are those numbers correct?

    How many loans is that?

    At an average of 300K a loan, that would be 1M in 2006 and 6.6M in 2007.

    How many of those will want to sell? have to sell? lead to foreclosure?

    ReplyDelete
  12. One of the 'safest' places to hold cash (in US dollars) is via treasurydirect.gov. You can buy t-bills that roll over every 4 weeks. Money is direct debit/credited to your bank account, or you can have the Treasury hold it.

    FDIC-proof.

    ReplyDelete
  13. middleageman said: "This seems to prove the point that foreclosures are a lagging indicator."

    As one middle-aged man to another, that point is well-known to those of us who have been around this block a few times. But thanks for pointing this out again, as we need to pass this experience on to those who will be experiencing it for the first time.

    I certainly wish that the Internet had existed when I was in the process of making my first 20 years of mistakes, and learning the lessons thereof.

    ReplyDelete