Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Sunday, January 29, 2006
Exiting 'The Church Of Greenspan'
The newswires are looking at the Greenspan/Bernanke hand-off; a reader asks, "Topic, Countdown to Bernanke. Greenspan retires on the 31st. Time to put in your final predictions."
Another adds, "How will Bernanke be able to reduce interest rates to a level which reflates the bubble without crashing the bond market, especially given recent reports on strong labor market and durable goods orders?"
"Mr. Greenspan oversaw a massive Internet stock bubble in the late 1990s. And what many see today as a housing bubble could leave headaches for his successor at the Fed. Was he too slow to react to a stock market bubble he saw coming for years? Did he need to say more about a bubbly housing market and skyrocketing debt?"
"Mr. Greenspan could have educated the public more about unsustainable trends in the stock market and home lending, Lee Price said. 'If he had been more courageous in talking about that imbalance in the stock market, it would've had a salutary effect on the real economy as well,' he said."
"For the past few years, Greenspan himself has emerged as little more than a cheerleader for the U.S. economy, putting a happy face on potential economic troubles with assurances that the underlying strength of the economy is sound and brushing off concerns about potential inflationary pressures. Gone are the pithy economic bon mots about 'irrational exuberance,' replaced by descriptions of the housing market as having 'froth' in some markets."
"On Greenspan's watch, the United States experienced only two relatively mild recessions, even though it was hit by a number of shocks, such as the 1987 stock market crash, two wars in the Persian Gulf, the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the bursting of the stock bubble in 2000 and terrorist attacks in 2001. Bernanke's job will be to keep the good times rolling."
"Ben Bernanke may never match Alan Greenspan's influence over the economy. 'The Fed now has limited leverage over the housing market,' said Peter Morici, an economics professor at the University of Maryland. 'It has been unable to tap the brakes on the housing market,' even though many economists fear housing prices have risen to dangerous heights in some markets. 'We're getting a price bubble on houses,' and the Fed has been unable to prick it, he said."
"Worship at the Church of Greenspan had reached such a feverish pitch that when Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid called the Federal Reserve chairman 'one of the biggest political hacks' in Washington, even fellow Democrats shushed him. It now appears that Reid has lots of company. Top economic minds are saying that Greenspan was not a great central banker, or even a good one."
"Central bankers are supposed to abhor market bubbles, but Greenspan blew air into two of them, a stock and a housing bubble, by keeping interest rates low. American consumers responded by borrowing money against their paper profits. They spent the dough, which propped up the economy. Now consumers are burdened with debt."
"Part of America's economic prosperity, The Economist notes, 'is based not on genuine gains in income, nor on high productivity growth, but on borrowing from the future.' As the Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises once said: 'It may sometimes be expedient for a man to heat the stove with his furniture. But he should not delude himself by believing that he has discovered a wonderful new method of heating his premises.'"
"Greenspan leaves behind an America that is the world's leading debtor nation. The United States must now borrow $2 billion from foreigners every working day to service its debt. Its personal-savings rate is negative. So expect a lot of economists to be sitting on their hands as Greenspan departs the Fed at the end of the month. Even his Enron Prize for Distinguished Service, which Greenspan accepted a few days after the energy company admitted to filing falsified earning reports, doesn't impress them."
Bernanke isn't going to have the option of reflating the bubble. The dollar faces huge threats from the current-accounts deficit and the budget deficit, which have the ability by themselves to drive up rates. Add in the inevitible spike in non-performing MBSs, and it doesn't matter what the economy does. The natural trend for rates is up, up, up. If the fed tries to zag when the market is zigging, long rates will move in a market-busting way. Any freedom imputed to Bernanke is illusory.
ReplyDeleteThe Fed could not stop the housing bubble. That's been the problem, it's been immune while the rest of the economy has been affected by monetary policy. I've said this before. The problem is that the Fed is lying about inflation and people have caught on. They've run to inflation resistant assets like housing to protect themselves. Think about how the CPI is miscalculated. Housing prices have double in the last few years and make up 1/3rd of most households' expenses. Wouldn't that seem to indicate double digit increases in inflation? Nope, because the Fed calculates not what it costs to own a house but pretends you are renting from yourself at rental rates. Somebody get a rope.
ReplyDeleteThis isn't about Greenspan. If you read the Austrian econ-books then you know fiat currency, fractional reserve banking and the Fed's money monopoly are creating these problems.
ReplyDeleteIt's counter productive to blame one man when the problem is the system. If you put a great captain on a sinking ship do you blame the captain when it sinks? You can bet the Federal Reserve and Banking cartel will do just that to prevent a Fed backlash.
During the tech-stock bubble, most of the stocks rose 20x in value or more. Has anybody's home gone up anywhere near that much? The same tech-stocks declined by 20x or more. Is anybody's home going to decline by that much? Home prices may be inflated, but to call them a bubble is historically inaccurate.
ReplyDeleteHas anone's home risen 20x in value? That's what most of the tech-stocks did. Will anyone's home decline by 20x in value, or become completely worthless? That's what most of the tech-stocks did. Calling today's housing market a "bubble" is historically inaccurate.
ReplyDeleteMoon_Jour said: "If the dude had a choice of becoming captain or not, and knew fully well in advance that there was a gaping wide hole on the bottom of the ship - but took the job anyway, with no intentions of repairing the ship."
ReplyDeleteI totally agree and I'm not forgiving Greenspan's mess but... The overwhelming focus on Greenspan instead of the Federal Reserve system diverts attention from the real problem.
We all know there is a bubble, not a lot of people need convincing, I think this blog in '06 should focus a bit more on WHY we have a bubble and not just proving one exists.
I think most people, like the above poster, believe that there was a gold standard during the depression. Here is a paragraph from "What has government done to our money?" which explains the real situation
The gold-exchange standard worked as follows: The United States remained on the classical gold standard, redeeming dollars in gold. Britain and the other countries of the West, however, returned to a pseudo-gold standard, Britain in 1926 and the other countries around the same time. British pounds and other currencies were not payable in gold coins, but only in large-sized bars, suitable only for international transactions. This prevented the ordinary citizens of Britain and other European countries from using gold in their daily life, and thus permitted a wider degree of paper and bank inflation. But furthermore, Britain redeemed pounds not merely in gold, but also in dollars; while the other countries redeemed their currencies not in gold, but in pounds. And most of these countries were induced by Britain to return to gold at overvalued parities. the result was a pyramiding of U.S. on gold, of British pounds on dollars, and of other European currencies on pounds—the "gold-exchange standard," with the dollar and the pound as the two "
So there was the gold-exchange standard. Once again, semantics was used to hide reality.