Examining the home price boom and its effect on owners, lenders, regulators, realtors and the economy as a whole.
Tuesday, January 31, 2006
Arizona Policy 'Favors Abstraction' Over Citizens
The Arizona press looks at the dead end that is the housing bubble. "Soaring home values make it possible for many in Arizona and nationally to feel as though they've got plenty saved up even as the national savings rate for 2005 was reported at negative 0.5 percent. That's the lowest level since 1933, in the heart of the Great Depression. Certainly, more consumers are seeing their homes as their savings, economists said. But placing too much 'saving' inside the home and pulling out cash as needs arise are unwise, Mike Sullivan, director of education for (a) credit-counseling agency said."
"'At some point. you are going to want to retire and not have any house payment,' he said."
"Wells Fargo senior economist Scott Anderson, said he is monitoring the savings rate closely. 'So long as the banks continue to lend to consumers, it's not going to be a problem,' he said. Easy credit is why consumers don't save in a traditional way, Sullivan said. 'You don't have to save anymore, and you don't have to delay purchases,' he said. 'Everybody just buys want they want and have stopped saving. Frankly, people are weak,' Sullivan said. 'If you can get something now, why wait?'"
"Traffic keeps getting worse, and it's not just because of light-rail construction. It's impossible to pave our way out of the problem. What's interesting is the one industry that manages to avoid any role in a solution: house builders. And everybody from economists to cab drivers keeps saying, 'People will come here no matter what.' So they'll accept higher prices for decent transportation, no?"
"But with the political clout of the housing industry, it will never happen. So policy continues to favor the abstraction of people who will come here over those who actually live here. Foreshadowing: A parcel in Phoenix's Desert Ridge sold for $1 million an acre. Will that be seen as a baseline for the future or an artifact from just before the bubble burst?"
"Buckeye issued a mere 77 building permits in 2000 for single-family homes. Compare that with this year's anticipated 9,600. As metro Phoenix has sprawled over the years, retail has followed rooftops. Major employment centers, however, haven't made the jump for the most part, RL Brown said."
"That creates a situation where workers must commute increasing distances for employment. The large swaths of available land in the southwest Valley and in Pinal County are the drive behind such robust growth, said Jay Butler, at Arizona State University. 'This is the big growth area,' Butler said. 'They have room for development.' What could soften the growth? Three bucks for a gallon of gas, Butler said."
"Gilbert Town officials brushed aside concerns a 40-percent decline last year in building permit applications will negatively impact the town's economy. System development fees in Gilbert average $13,400 per home. Tony Hyland, a business owner in Gilbert and former president of the Gilbert Chamber of Commerce, cautions placing too much emphasis on revenue from retail sales."
"'Gilbert has been living of the fat off the land over the last ten years due to explosive residential growth,' he said. 'Sales tax is controlled by the economy. Any community that relies on sales tax revenues is making a big mistake. The economy is fluctuating. I don't think the town anticipated a $26 million loss in revenues from residential system development fees in 2005,' Hyland said."
"Mr. Hyland said the drop in residential building permits is a sign people are looking elsewhere to move and build homes. 'My gut feeling is people are looking for less expensive homes and less crowded communities to move into,' he said. Gilbert Director of Economic Development Greg Tilque said despite home prices increasing for homes in Gilbert, the town is still growing. 'Keep in mind, we still have 3,000 homes being built,' he said."
"Gilbert Mayor Steve Berman said Gilbert's retail sales tax revenues will make up for the decline in development impact fees. He acknowledged Gilbert's housing market is slowing down. 'There's not a lot anybody can do about it," he said. "We are shifting our focus from residential to retail. It's one of those things. Sooner or later we are going to run out of room. All this is going to do is slow the train down long enough to count the cars.'"
As I have pointed out before, residential development is a net negative for a community. It requires utilities, fire and police support. If homes were built as people moved here, it wouldn't be a problem. But with every town and builder trying to cash in on the boom, and apparently no restraint from the state or lenders, these towns have painted themselves into a corner.
ReplyDeleteockurt,
ReplyDeleteJust south and east of Phoenix, on the other side of Mesa.
Ben, I've got to disagree. CSD (Convetional Suburban Delvelopment) residential development patterns are a cash positive exercise for nearly every community right from the start. The roads and parks and often schools are donated as part of the development agreements while the taxes are far in excess of the marginal incread costs. These developments only lose money when there is collusion.
ReplyDeleteThen there's the all too common "It's impossible to pave our way out of the [congestion] problem." This in an area building light rail. The TTI (Texas Transportation Institute) publishes dozens of studies every year and the data are explicit; transit causes congestion and it is possible to build your way out of congestion.
Robert,
ReplyDeleteI came across this type of info in reports coming out of Nevada, where there is a clean slate, so to speak. There was this county planner who was being interviewed by a city council regarding a big subdivision. She went into great detail about the ongoing costs for the city to service the homes and pointed out that new jobs weren't driving the construction, just a housing boom.
So even though the developer wanted to put up something like 1,500 houses, they turned it down because they didn't have the money. It's in the archives; last summer I think.
I grew up in Gilbert ...great, tight-knit farming community up until the early 80's...back then land was plentiful, cotton prices down, so many farmers sold (some reluctantly) to raise lots of cash...and many moved further south to start another farm...everyone I knew and grew up with was somehow involved in the supply side of those transactions. A few farmers held out, but now they are landlocked (hence the smell), and not enjoying their life very much. It works both ways...folks try to remain in farming (some 3rd or 4th generation), but McMansion neighborhood rug rats shoot at their livestock, muck up irrigation ditches, vandalize machinery. I have sympathy for those old guys who tried to hang on to a lifestyle. Who do people think supply this country with milk, food, cotton for clothing, hay for livestock, etc?
ReplyDeleteOh..right...China.
thank you happy renter for the link.
ReplyDeleteziprealty just started a new feature that allows tracking of homes that had price reductions. Of the 32,000 Phoenix listings on the MLS, 9,000 of which already had a price reduction. That's nearly 1/3!!! If this isn't proof that the Phoenix market has burst, I don't know what is.
Percentage of Reduced Listings Per Market
RE: AZ posts,
ReplyDeleteGreat insights from Phoenix area locals. The whole situation is really sad. At some point in the last few years, the state decided to switch to an expensive land model. They have bottled up 2,000 acre plots here and there and to what purpose; so cows can run on it? And we're to believe raw dirt is worth $100k or more per acre?
A million dollars for a hot, dusty, desert parcel, ugh.
ReplyDeleteWhen you put it that way, it struck an eerie feeling in me.
We laugh today at the rubes in the 1920's who bought Florida swampland, thinking they were such simpletons to over pay so much for what is "obviously" property with little redeeming value. I wonder if in several generations the batch of people today going into fiscally imprudent real estate transactions will be lumped along with the rubes from the 1920s.